EDUCATION REVOLUTION
FALL 2004
NUMBER 39
Looking for News with Albert Lamb
Any Children Not Left Behind?
Killy Reopening
Windsor House Threatened
Gal Friedman’s Olympic Gold
For Profit Charters Crash
Being There with Jerry Mintz
Renaissance School
Mail & Communication:
Main Section
Public Alternatives
Home Education
International News
Conferences
Jobs and Internships
AERO Books and Videos
Revolutionary Times:
The Day in the life of an AERO
Conference
by Dima Klyuy
AERO Conference: Three Winning
Essays
Good Evening
by Silas Hundt
The New American Crisis
by Thomas G. Sherer
Windsor House is a Safe Haven
by Chloe Deaken
Summerhill Woodstock
by Tomo Usuda
Rudolph Steiner: Home
Education Pioneer?
By Gareth Lewis
How Small is Small?
By Mary Tasker
Kids Corner:
Someone’s Will
by Vadim Potamakhin
Books Etc.
by Aleksandra Majstorac Kobijski
Welcome to the Education
Revolution!
At the heart of
this magazine we have a report on last summer’s AERO Conference in upstate New
York, written by an AERO intern, and also three essays by alternative school
students, which were delivered as speeches at the conference.And on page 52
Mary Tasker makes the case for smaller schools.
Albert
albertlamb@bigfoot.com
A Word from Jerry
At the Brooklyn Free School
meeting a while back the adults had introductions and discussion for more than
an hour. During that time the children entertained themselves as well as they
could. I took a few pictures and did a little videotaping. This seemed to catch
the attention of the two- and four-year-old brothers who were in the room. I had
never met them before and they never said anything to me but they made eye
contact. At one point they left the room. But a few seconds later I realized
they were in back of me as they reached through a crack in the double doors and
tapped me on the shoulder! We played a little game with that while the meeting
was going on.
Later in the meeting it was
suggested that we hear something from the children in the room, or have a small
‘meeting’ with them. The discussion started with the two 6-year-olds who had
participated in the last meeting and a 13-year-old. The issue came up about what
age students should be at the new school. The three doubted whether anyone
younger than five could understand the meetings. At that point the
four-year-old, Teseo, was playing in the other room. I suggested we invite him
in to see if he could understand. I had confidence that he could. One of the
kids went to get him.
I explained to him briefly what a
meeting was all about, what voting was, and about raising your hand to be
recognized. We continued the discussion about ages. Sylvan, the 13-year-old,
blurted out that he thought people from age 1 to 34 should be able to come. The
6-year-olds said they thought one was too young. The one-year-old would require
too much attention, would mess things up, and would not understand the meeting.
The 13-year-old said he hadn’t said that. The four year old raised his hand and
said that he had clearly heard him say one-year-olds could come!
Later there was a discussion
about the age at which students could safely go outside the school by
themselves. The six-year-olds thought 7 would be OK. The 13-year-old thought 8
would be safe. But the 4-year-old thought 10 would be safer. He was worried that
younger kids might wander over railroad tracks or be hit by a car.
Nobody after that brought up the
idea that four year olds were too young for the meeting!
Looking For News
with Albert Lamb
Any Children Not Left Behind?
Let’s start by looking for news
where it is bound to be painful and difficult, and get it over with for the rest
of this issue. The No Child Left Behind package of laws that President Bush
pushed down everyone’s throats is now in the process of being swallowed. This,
inevitably, won’t be a pretty sight. First, from the front line:
Back to school.
Will it be business as usual?
Will teachers eagerly anticipate
meeting a new group of students?
My, how things have changed in
just a few short years! Now it’s hard to find a teacher or administrator who
looks forward to the requirements of “No Child Left Behind.” Each school year
gets more dismal as elementary teachers are forced to spend much time drilling
for standardized tests in the three R’s and reduce, or leave out, the arts,
sciences, physical education and social studies — the subjects that make school
interesting and learning fun — the subjects that make the three R’s meaningful.
Lynn Stoddard Author of Educating for Human Greatness
In the two years since the law
passed there has been scattered resistance to the NCLB law in school systems
around the country, on the grounds that living with these new requirements is
too costly and difficult. Federal money that was supposed to help schools with
this process was never allocated and states are having to foot the entire bill
to fund this questionable enterprise themselves. Under the new system if the
students, teachers, or schools don’t meet annual targets, established through
the kids’ test scores, they are penalized. Good schools are having to dumb
themselves down and chronically under-funded schools face a whole new crisis.
But schools all across the country are being snowed under with red tape:
No Child Left Behind Meets
Resistance, by Sam Dillon, NY Times: Three
Connecticut school districts have rejected federal money rather than comply with
the red tape that accompanies the law, and several Vermont districts have
shifted federal poverty money away from schools to shield them from sanctions.
Some analysts see the scattered actions as the front end of a backlash that will
probably swell next year, when early penalties are likely to be imposed on
thousands of schools across the nation.
Under the law, every racial and
demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math
tests to make “adequate yearly progress.” If any group fails to reach targets
for two years running, a school is labeled “needing improvement,” and must
provide transportation for students to transfer to higher-scoring schools or pay
for tutoring. Continued shortfalls trigger escalating sanctions that culminate
in removal of the staff. It is an accountability system with myriad ways to
disqualify schools. This year 26,000 of the nation’s 93,000 public schools
failed to make adequate yearly progress, according to a teachers union tally,
fueling predictions that the law could eventually label nearly all schools as
failing.
By the nature of things the
response to this law has been local, as different states find themselves having
to face their own problems in playing by the new NCLB rules. So far the most
active resistance doesn’t seem to be on the East Coast:
Utah Bill to Reject Education
Law and Federal Money by Ronnie Lynn, The
Salt Lake Tribune: Utah legislators advanced a bill that rejects No Child Left
Behind and the $103 million-plus it brings to the state’s revenue-starved
schools. The House Education Committee unanimously forwarded House Bill 43 to
the floor, a move that has national implications and the potential to devastate
more than 200 Utah schools that rely on federal dollars to improve achievement
among disadvantaged students. Rep. Margaret Dayton said her bill sends
Washington an unmistakable message that it is overstepping its bounds in a
domain historically left to states.
Nebraska Schools Skip
Mandatory Tests, by Tracy Dell’Angela,
Chicago Tribune: With criticism mounting over implementation of the federal
accountability law and states scrambling to overhaul their testing systems to
comply, Nebraska alone has succeeded in saying no to mandatory statewide tests.
The state has persuaded federal education officials to approve the nation’s most
unorthodox assessment system, which allows school districts to use portfolios to
measure student progress. Nebraska’s system is far from perfect; it is
expensive, it is time-consuming for teachers and it makes comparisons among
districts difficult. The system works here in part because of the state’s small
school districts and homogeneous population. But critics of No Child Left Behind
– and the high-stakes testing mania it has spawned – say Nebraska’s example
proves that educators can create a different kind of accountability system that
meaningfully measures student learning. Federal education officials said
Nebraska’s system passed muster because the state’s constitution guarantees
local control over school accountability and the state was able to demonstrate
that the assessments were valid and reliable.
Oregon May Challenge No Child
Left Behind Law by Betsy Hammond, The
Oregonian: Gov. Ted Kulongoski is weighing a pitch by the nation’s largest
teachers union to make Oregon a plaintiff in a court challenge to block parts of
the federal No Child Left Behind school accountability law. The National
Education Association has been looking since July for a state to sue the Bush
administration, arguing that the law requires sweeping changes in schools
without paying for them. No state has signed on, despite widespread complaints
by educators that the law requires too much of schools. The Oregon Education
Association, the NEA affiliate in Oregon, has urged the governor to take up the
cause, said Mark Toledo, the group’s general counsel.
One response to NCLB may be built
around the fact that the federal demands being made on local schools are not
properly funded:
Wisconsin’s attorney general has
issued an opinion that the federal government can’t force states to comply with
the No Child Left Behind Act without fully funding it. The opinion was the first
in the country from a state attorney general on the education reform measure,
according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Attorney General Peg
Lautenschlager said “clear and compelling” language in the law itself says the
federal government can’t make states or school districts pay the law’s mandated
costs for improved education. The opinion could be the first step toward a
lawsuit challenging the law, said Scott Young, NCSL education policy associate.
Todd Richmond, AP.
It looks as though the Bush
administration has been prepared for a certain amount of backlash and is ready
to make some small compromises, in order to establish their new program:
A rebellion against the federal
No Child Left Behind law in more than half the states’ legislatures has fizzled
out, for now, with only a handful of Vermont school districts following through
on threats to ignore the new education law, reports Eric Kelderman. At
the height of this year’s backlash against President Bush’s signature domestic
policy initiative, 27 state legislatures drafted 54 bills to protest the costs,
penalties and unprecedented federal oversight of school policy under the 2002
act. U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige and his deputies crisscrossed the
country on scores of trips to smooth over differences with state legislators and
educators. In the end, only the Democratic governor of Maine and the Republican
governors of Utah and Vermont signed bills critical of the act, which is
staunchly defended by the Republican Bush administration.
http://www.stateline.org
No Child Left Behind Standards
Being Changed by Michael Dobbs, Washington
Post: Education Secretary Roderick R. Paige said he is planning more changes
over the coming weeks, including a new, more flexible interpretation of the
requirement that all students be assigned a “fully qualified teacher.” He
previously agreed to changes in the way students with disabilities are treated
under the law, allowing the most seriously disabled to be tested separately from
other students. Under the new regulations announced February 19, states will be
permitted to grant a one-year transition period for English-language learners in
their first year in U.S. public schools, which means that these students will be
temporarily excluded from their schools’ test results. At the other end of the
performance spectrum, students will continue to be counted as members of the
“limited English-proficient” subgroup for two years after they learn English.
About 5.5 million students, or 12 percent of all U.S. K-12 students, are covered
by the new regulations.
The next step may be for states
in different parts of the country to get together and form a united response to
the new NCLB regime:
Fourteen states have asked the
Bush administration for permission to use alternative methods for showing
academic gains under the No Child Left Behind law, reports Diana Jean Schemo.
The 14 states, most of which had their own systems for raising academic
performance in place before the federal No Child Left Behind law took effect two
years ago, charged that as currently written, the law would brand too many
schools “in need of improvement,” and thus squander limited resources. They
asked for permission to use “growth models,” in which schools would avoid the
federal law’s remedies and penalties if they showed academic gains, even if
those gains fell short of the amount required by 2014, as the law mandates.
The New York Times
In the meantime the more
disadvantaged kids are the first to feel the effects of the new arrangements:
Schools Pressured to Drop Bad
Students: In the 2001-02 school year, 17,400
students – 17.6 percent – dropped out of Chicago schools, according to an
analysis of state data by the Greater West Town Community Development Project.
That is up from 13.5 percent in 1992. The numbers are too high and the pressure
on schools to push out truant, low-performing students is only growing, several
experts, including Illinois Education Supt. Robert Schiller, testified at a
state Senate Education Committee meeting in Chicago. Kate N. Grossman,
Chicago Sun-Times.
A national study
on the “hidden crisis” of low minority graduation has been released by two
nonpartisan groups, the Civil Rights Project (CRP) at Harvard and the
Urban Institute (UI). The results of the study should help small-schools
educators and activists in explaining the need for change. The study concludes:
“America’s minority children are being left behind when it comes to high school
graduation. High school graduation rates now are alarmingly low for most
minority groups, particularly among young males. In 2001, only 50 percent of all
black students, 51 percent of Native American students, and 53 percent of all
Hispanic students graduated from high school. Black, Native American and
Hispanic males fare even worse: 43 percent, 47 percent and 48 percent,
respectively. This compares to about 75 percent of all white high school
students graduating on a nationwide basis. “The drop-out problem for minority
school children in the U.S. is likely to get even worse due to an overemphasis
under ‘No Child Left Behind’ on test-based accountability. Under such an
accountability system, it may be easier and more cost-effective to raise overall
test scores by removing low performing students from the test-taking pool than
it is to invest in the resources and programs needed to improve the academic
performance of the struggling students. Mike Klonsky.
It is hard not to get the feeling
that there is something built into this legislation that will make thriving
under the new rules almost impossible. Gordon Vars, of the National Association
for Core Curriculum, has something to say about this:
First of all, what is it that is
impossible to do? Probably most obvious is the NCLB requirement that all
students reach 100% “proficiency” by 2014. Bruce M. Smith, editor of the Phi
Delta Kappan, put it succinctly in his editorial in the October, 2003, issue. He
reminded us of “the natural range of human variation” and “the simple fact that
children are in school for just a fraction of their lives. To require schools to
make up for all the differences in children’s nature and in the conditions of
their nurture is absurd”
Schools must demonstrate adequate
yearly progress (AYP). For a school to show AYP, all ethnic groups, all
socioeconomic groups, English-language learners, and special education students
must make AYP separately. Ninety-five percent of each group must be tested, and
if any one group fails to make AYP, the school as a whole fails. The official
phrase is “needs improvement,” but headlines across the nation reveal how
everyone actually thinks about it. Schools must continue to make AYP until, by
2014, 100% of a school’s students must score “proficient.”
So why set up a situation where
most of the public schools in the country are bound to fail. Is this legislation
part of some sort of corporate sponsored conspiracy? Gordon Vars:
A Conspiracy? To those who
suspect a conspiracy, NCLB is merely the “coup de grace” of a war against public
education that was declared in the “Nation at Risk” report of 1983 (NCEE). In
that rhetorical tour-de-force, corporate interests and the politicians they
controlled launched a deliberate campaign to degrade and dismantle public
education. Their aim? To turn education of the young over to private schools and
for-profit corporations.
So what can we do about it?
Gordon Vars again:
Protest, Get Political. Before
NCLB was passed, I was urging educators to fight the high-stakes testing mania.
Individuals like Alfie Kohn and groups like FairTest (www.fairtest.org) were
trying to mobilize educators and the public to pressure legislatures to modify
state testing laws. Now the stakes are even higher, involving much more than
your individual career, the success of your school, or even the fate of the
middle school movement. The struggle is nationwide in scope; the future of the
entire public school system is at stake. With all its limitations,
publicly-supported education has served for decades as the “bulwark of
democracy” and a ladder for economic betterment for countless thousands of
people. I doubt very much that democracy, as we know it, could survive the
demise of public education.
One group standing up against
this law is The Coalition of Essential Schools (CES). To add your name to their
effort or download the “Take a Stand” online action kit, visit: http://www.essentialschools.org/cs/about/create/ces_hst
Another group criticizing the
bill is the National Center for Fair & Open Testing.
Killy Reopening!
In the 20tth Century
two men in the UK held up the banner for freedom and democracy in education –
both of them Scots. A. S. Neill had his Summerhill on the East coast of England
and John Aitkenhead had Kilquhanity House School up in Southwest Scotland.
Kilquhanity was started early in
the dark days of the 2nd World
War, in 1940, by John and his wife Morag. For 56 years it took in boarding
students from around Scotland and around the world, until it was finally closed
under pressure from government inspectors. John died the following year, aged
88.
Now it is to reopen under the
auspices of another of the most famous names in democratic education,
Shin-Ichiro Hori. Many years ago Professor Hori began translating Neill’s books
into Japanese and then went on to start the first democratic school in Japan,
Kinokuni, in 1992. Now he has bought the property at Castle Douglas and plans to
get Kilquhanity going again, at first as a summer camp. The school is in a
beautiful spot out in the country and it should be an ideal place for Japanese
and Scottish kids to spend happy summers. Once the school is restored to its
former glory Professor Hori hopes to run it year round. This last summer he
worked there with a group of 20 Japanese kids, rebuilding a tree house.
Windsor House Threatened
The wonderful Windsor House
School, after flourishing for 33 years tucked away in Western Canada, in North
Vancouver in British Columbia, has been forced by the provincial government to
change itself in ways that threaten its continued existence. Windsor House is
perhaps the longest running state supported democratic school in the world. Here
is how the school describes itself on it’s website:
The Windsor House community are being forced to
“come into alignment” with new British Columbia Ministry Of Education
regulations that insist on letter grades for the kids, plus testing and grading
and full regular attendance. If they can’t comply they must lose their essential
funding. Within this process they have also been forced to move out of their old
home into an inappropriate and temporary space, shared with an adult education
facility. Meanwhile it looks as if the North Vancouver School District has had
secret plans all along to sell their property for financial gain, assuming that
they would fold under all this pressure. Canela Michelle, of Windsor House,
writes for us of how the school came into being:
You can read more about Windsor
House in an essay written by one of the students, Chloe Deaken, on page 34.
For-Profit Charters Crash
In August one of America’s
largest charter school operators went into bankruptcy and had to accept that all
60 of its California schools will not be reopening. Sam Bond, of the New York
Times, tells the story from the point of view of the school superintendent whose
district licensed dozens of the schools:
“Hysterical parents are calling us, swearing and
shouting,” Mr. Larson said in an interview in Oro Grande last week. “People are
walking off with assets all over the state. We’re absolutely sinking.”
The disintegration of the
California Charter Academy, the largest chain of publicly financed but privately
run charter schools to slide into insolvency, offers a sobering picture of what
can follow. Thousands of parents were forced into a last-minute search for
alternate schools, and some are still looking; many teachers remain jobless; and
students’ academic records are at risk in abandoned school sites across
California.
Investigators are sifting through
records seeking causes of the disaster, which has raised new questions about how
charter schools are regulated.
“Until the Charter Academy went
into its tailspin, few people predicted that these crashes could be so bloody,
but this has been a catastrophe for many people,” said Bruce Fuller, a professor
of education at the University of California, Berkeley. “The critics of
market-oriented reforms warned of risks with the philosophy of
let-the-buyer-beware, but in this case, buyers were just totally hung out to
dry.”
Coincidence? Gal Friedman –
The first Israeli Olympic Gold medallist – is a graduate of the Hadera
Democratic School
By Yaacov Hecht
On Wednesday 24th of
August Gal Friedman won the Olympic gold medal in wind surfing in the Athens
2004 Olympic Games.
Gal started training as a child.
At age 13 he won second place in the youth world championships. Later he won the
bronze medal at the Atlanta Olympic Games and came in third in the 2002 world
championships in Thailand. His latest achievement is the gold medal at the 2004
Olympics.
Gal was born to a family of sea
and surf lovers. Both his father and uncle were Israeli champions at sailing and
spent much time on the sea.
Gal studied at the democratic
school in Hadera as did his sister Maayan and brother Yuval. His mother was an
active parent in the school.
Gal loved the sea, He had a
special arrangement with the school, his family and sailing club – on days with
a good wind he went right to the beach instead of school, on days with no wind
he came to school.
In addition to training at
windsurfing Gal spent most of his time at school playing. Academics didn’t
interest him and school served the purpose of calming his parents (not too
difficult a task), and immediate environment, enabling them to see the beauty in
enabling Gal to do what he loved and was interested in.
In my opinion, the main factors
contributing to Gals success were: his personality and the support of his
family.
The role of the school was to
enable the existing talents and desires to manifest and not hinder his talents
and love for the sea, surfing and sport, the school helped to waver the
anxieties surrounding “how will he succeed without trigonometry etc…” School
helped to strengthen his belief in himself, and encourage him to develop in
doing what he was passionate about – windsurfing.
At some stage, at age 14 Gal
decided to quit windsurfing in favor of building remote-operated cars and
airplanes. The extended family was up in arms – how can such a great talent go
to waste? But his parents were adamant about supporting Gal in doing only what
he chose and did not pressure him to return to windsurfing. And of course, Gal
did return – he returned a different Gal.
Once again, after winning the
Bronze at the Atlanta Olympics, Gal quit windsurfing in favor of biking. Today
he does both sports.
All the Israeli newspapers have
been assessing Gals victory: the first Israeli to win a gold Olympic medal. The
papers noted his willpower and his clear goal as well as his ability to achieve
under pressure. The story that left the deepest impression on me was that a year
before the Athens Olympics, Gal and the Greek windsurfer Conconstus, who were
the two leaders in this sport, decided to train together. They agreed that the
best way for both of them to reach their highest achievements would be to train
together and take the gold and the silver at the Athens games, leaving the race
for the gold to the last minute. And that is indeed what happened.
It’s intriguing to think where it
will lead to…
A day after he won, Gal’s mother,
Dganit Friedman, published the following letter in the leading Israeli newspaper
“Yedioth Achronot.”
Dearest Gal,
Yesterday I sat with Dad, Maayan
and the rest of the family and our friends – we watched you win the Olympic
medal. You made history. I knew you could do it, that you had the ability, but I
was scared to imagine it. Since yesterday I cannot stop thinking about Yaacov
Hecht, the principal of the Democratic School in Hadera where you went to
school. He always said that it doesn’t matter what you study and what page you
reach in your workbook, that the important thing is to focus on what it is you
want and to achieve in your field of choice.
This was the educational motto we
followed in raising you and your siblings Maayan and Yuval. When you skipped
school, we were not concerned, you had a direction and you followed it. Today we
are certain that your principal was right. The small contribution we, your
parents made to your gold medal was in giving you the freedom to choose your
own way.
I love you my dearest Gal and I
am very proud of you and happy for you. You stuck to your desires and made your
dream come true. Since you left for Athens I have been sending you hearts over
the e-mail and pictures of you with your brother Yuval and girlfriend Michal. I
can’t wait to see and hug you. I miss you
-Mom.
Being There
With Jerry Minz
Renaissance School
Beyond the fact that I knew that they wanted some
sort of demonstration of the democratic process, I really didn’t know what to
expect when I walked in to Renaissance School one day this last June. I didn’t
know what age kids I would be working with, how much time I would have and what
they wanted me to do. Actually, I’m never very concerned about that kind of
situation, and I wasn’t on that day. I got into the building with two minutes to
spare.
The class had about 25 students.
They were about 11 and 12 years old in the sixth grade. The teacher was excited
to have me come in and do this, and it was arranged by Monte Joffee, the
principal of the school, who had been at the IDEC in 2003 and who had been
instrumental in helping us organize our proposal for the school of democracy,
which would have been a public alternative democratic school.
I started out by introducing
myself briefly, and asked them a few questions about their class. I took out my
book and showed them the title (No Homework and Recess all Day), getting
a little rise out of that, but in general this group was rather laid back.
They were mostly minority: black,
Hispanic, Asian, and some white. I read the poem that I wrote when I was 15
years old to them (from the front section of my book) about how I felt about
school at the time. I told them a few stories about the kinds of things that are
possible in a democratic school; such as the time we worked our way to the
Bahamas and the time we wound up flying over our school. I decided to show them
some of John Gatto’s video, where he talks about why the public school system
was set up; that it wasn’t set up to create poets or scientists but to basically
keep people in their place so that there is a much larger group to do the dirty
work for society and follow orders, buy things, etc. They really got a kick
about the section from South Park about how kids are being misdiagnosed for
Ritilin.
By the time we were done with
that and had some discussion, there were only about 15 to 20 minutes left, but
we decided to quickly demonstrate how the democratic process works. I explained
to them that the first thing that we needed to do make an agenda: They could
bring up either something that they wanted to see happen – we had just finished
talking about the possibility of going to India and a lot of kids expressed
interest (but it was not put on the agenda) – or things that they had concerns
about. One of the items they put on was about the lunches and the food, and a
second really surprised me: naptime! They felt that they weren’t getting enough
sleep and they wanted to have a chance to take a nap. Another was freetime,
another was homework. So, we started with the lunches for discussion.
They complained for a period of
time about how bad the lunches were, how little choice they had, how much of the
food was unidentifiable, how the portions were small, and how they liked it
better when there were vending machines. Finally, a proposal was made that they
at least have a choice between milk and juice instead of just milk. The next
proposal had to do with the portion size, and someone pointed out that they are
allowed to be served what would be considered to be 2/3 of a proper portion. It
was passed that someone research why exactly this was.
This brought us pretty close to
the end of the period, but what happened then was interesting. The kids all said
that they wanted to sit in on the next section and that they wanted to join the
next class and keep on doing this. That would double the size of the number of
people in the room to 50. That took us to about 11:30, and then we broke for
lunch.
During lunchtime, I met with the
principal and three other teachers from the school. The teacher of this class
commented on how this group was quieter and less responsive than the later
group, and they asked me what kind of things you can do about that. I said,
“Well, you know, when you have a set group like this, it can develop a certain
culture, and so those were the kinds of cultures from the group. That kind of
thing was impossible in my school because each class was attended by the people
from the whole school that wanted to attend.” This seemed to startle them a
little bit because it became clear to them that this was a different paradigm
that I was talking about.
When we got back from lunch,
there were 50 kids packed in the room First, we tried to summarize what had
happened in the morning, and I showed a little more of the video. We then
continued the meeting, and several items were added to the agenda. We now had a
little more time to work. What was amazing and impressive to me was how quiet
they were as a big group, and also how much they got into it. There was more
energy in the second group, but of course they were now all combined. A big
discussion came up about bringing back the vending machines. Monty was now in
the classroom and he said that he thought that they were taken out because of
some regulation that stated that they could not operate in competition with the
school lunches. There was a possibility that they could lose the school lunch
program because of a lack of participation. Then the idea was brought up that
the vending machines could be shut off during meal times. A vote was taken and
it was unanimously in favor of bringing the vending machines back with the
possibility of having them serve some healthy food.
Part of the system I demonstrate
includes polling of the minority in all votes, and the possibility of a revote
with more discussion. When asking for the minority opinion, Monty expressed his
concern about it. Then people mentioned that they had bake sales often and that
the kids would take their money and spend it on bake sale stuff, and that that
was legitimate. And so I pointed out that instead of doing just bake sales, make
healthy food and sell that. One of the proposals was that they have bake sales
up to once a week and sell healthy food, and have the profit go to the class.
Another proposal was brought up regarding the vending machines, but both of the
proposals were shot down. They decided that vending machines were not practical
to bring back, and that they didn’t want to do bake sales every week.
We continued on to the next item
on the agenda, and by acclimation, the next thing that they wanted to talk about
was naptime. They said that they weren’t getting enough sleep, that they had to
be in school at 8:30 and so they had to get up at 6-something. If the younger
kids could get naptime, why couldn’t they get naptime? They needed it! Someone
else pointed out that, for a while, meditation had been done in the class, led
by a teacher. One of the teachers, pointed out that they had plenty of time to
get to sleep when they got home. The kids reacted by saying that “No! we have
all kinds of things to do!” One of the kids said, “I don’t get home from
softball until 7 or 8 o’clock, and then I’m supposed to do homework, and when am
I supposed to sleep?”
What was cool was that sometimes,
when the noise level got up a bit, their teacher tried to shut them up, and I
told her that she was out of order! The kids got a kick out of that. The same
things happened when Monty spoke out of his turn. They learned to raise their
hands. Monty again voiced a certain amount of opposition to this proposal that
they have 10 minutes of naptime every day. He said he was afraid of the flak
that he might get from the parents or other people that the kids were allowed to
sleep all day, or from taking visitors around and seeing all the kids sleeping
in the room. So, one of his amendments was that they put a sign up that said
that this was an experiment by the 6th grade class to see if learning is
enhanced. Another proposal was that they find some way to see if learning was
going to be enhanced by this process. A third proposal was that it be tried for
one month. The girl who made the original proposal reluctantly accepted the
amendments and it was passed.
There is less than one month left
of school; it would be interesting to see if they follow up on any of the things
that we passed. At one point, one of the kids said, “Is it true? Are these
things really going to be put into effect?” And I said, “Well, in a proper
democracy yes; in a class democracy where things were being decided, yes!
However, since this is more of a demonstration, then this would be more in the
form of recommendations. That didn’t seem to daunt them at all; they were
pleased to have some sort of voice.
At that point, I gave up being
chairperson and said that we should have an election, and that one of the
students should take over as chairperson. Many people wanted to chair, but it
came down to two kids: one was a black girl and the other was an Asian boy. The
black girl got more votes, so she started to chair and did a pretty decent job.
We didn’t have much time left, because the meeting had been going on for well
over an hour. The topic that they were talking about was homework, and it
basically had gotten to the point of the kids complaining bitterly about the
amount of homework that they had. We hadn’t yet made any proposals when we had
to stop it. I went ahead and summarized the process, and asked the kids if they
wanted to do this kind of thing. Somebody was afraid that we were going to take
too much time away from class time, and one of the kids said, “We may just wind
having to pay for this alone because we’ve taken this time here.” They
really had the concept that they would get punished for doing something
interesting and fun by having more work loaded up on them. I said that I
considered one of the most educational parts of my school to be the school
meeting. They liked the idea of doing a meeting once a week. I hope that we can
demonstrate democratic decision-making process to many other public and private
schools and programs. Anyone interested can contact us in the USA, at 800
769-4171.or at info@educationrevolution.org
Mail & Communication
Edited by Carol Morley
Notes from National Coalition
of Education Activists: Our regular e-bulletin is back! We took a few months
off to reorganize our communications systems (web, email, and database). This
project remains a work in progress with many exciting new features to be added
in the coming months. On a related note, please take a minute to update our
contact information in your lists: NCEA, 1420 Walnut St., Suite 720,
Philadelphia, PA 19102. Tel: (215) 735-2418. Email: info@edactivists.org.
I just learned about research
from several educators that documents the benefit of using a person-centered
approach in education. The studies were published in the 1970s and 1980s by
highly trained researchers (David Aspy and Flora Roebuck) using statistical
terminology. Luckily they also describe the results in a way anyone can
understand. In short, the findings were that teachers who use the person-centered
approach (for the study this was defined as having empathy for the students,
respect for them, being genuine or real with students, and treating them as
capable of self-direction), had students who missed fewer days of school, had
higher measures of self-regard, made greater gains in academic achievement and
I.Q. scores, presented fewer disciplinary problems, committed fewer acts of
vandalism, made gains in creativity scores, were more spontaneous, and used
higher levels of thinking. Here is a website that explains a little bit of this
research (the website is for an organization that conducts workshops and
training for businesses): http://www.ridge.com/art-trsel.htm. Dana Bennis
Puget Sound Community School
is celebrating our 10th year
this year, completing 10 school years of innovative, imaginative education. We
have defied the odds, starting a small, independent school and keeping it going
for 10 years. PSCS is fully enrolled right now with 35 happy students. We are
thrilled to be getting established in our new home base, the University Heights
Community Center. In addition, PSCS is now an officially approved State of
Washington private school. Students interested in pursuing a state-recognized
high school diploma can now do it right at PSCS. Between now and June 30th, the
end of our 2003/2004 fiscal year, every dollar raised at PSCS will be matched,
dollar for dollar, up to $20,000. For more information: Puget Sound Community
School, 5031 University Way NE, #111, Seattle, WA 98105.
We’re delighted to report that Blue Mountain School’s charter proposal was approved by a 6-1 vote of the South Lane School District Board. It has been almost two years in the process. We presented the proposal last November and it was denied in January (2-5). The Oregon law requires that the criteria for denial be spelled out and that we had the right to resubmit with responses amending the proposal, which we did in May. By the time we were done, except for the one Board member, the other Board members who voted no in January changed their position and by their favorable vote they indicated that they understand that the Blue Mountain students are free to control their own education. Now that the proposal has been approved and when the charter is signed and submitted to the state, we’ll be in line for our $300,000 implementation grant and a much greater sense of security. The process has been long and arduous, but it brought the fractious Blue Mountain School community together. And that’s good. Laura Stine, Chair, Charter Proposal Committee, Blue Mountain School, Cottage Grove, Oregon.
From Wal-Mart Pours Riches into Education Reform, by Jim Hopkins, USA Today: Wal-Mart’s founders transformed U.S. business. Now they are taking on a very different subject: the nation’s public schools. The Waltons have quietly become top philanthropists in education reform, including controversial charter-school and school-voucher causes. They have donated at least $701 million to education charities since 1998. The Waltons’ giving could soar to as much as $1 billion a year as they shift more riches to charity. The shift could spur far-reaching education reform, say experts on philanthropy and education. “That could totally transform public education in this country. It’s a mighty thumb on the scale,” says Chuck Collins, co-founder of Responsible Wealth, a group critical of the influence of the megarich. Already, Walton money has helped pay for 62,000 scholarships for needy children in private schools across the USA. Walton money also extends to education politics. Allies say the family’s giving is injecting competition between public and private schools that will produce better-educated children, and so reduce unemployment, crime and other social ills. Critics say the Waltons could do the opposite: weaken public schools by encouraging the flow of tax dollars to less-regulated charter schools and to religious and other private schools through vouchers. The prospect of the Walton billions is “alarming,” says Marc Egan, head of anti-voucher efforts at the National School Boards Association.
From Two New Reports Urge that
Policy Makers Critically Examine Virtual Schools and their Curriculum: Two
reports, each examining a company that promotes “virtual” education, were
released by the Education Policy Studies Laboratory (EPSL) at Arizona State
University. The reports conclude that “virtual” education needs to be more
carefully scrutinized by policy makers. “Knowledge Universe and Virtual Schools:
Educational Breakthrough or Digital Raid on the Public Treasury?” by Gerald
Bracey (George Mason University), and “The K12 Virtual Primary School History
Curriculum: A Participant’s-eye View” by Susan Ohanian explore the workings of
Knowledge Universe, or KU, a little-known but increasingly influential
investment firm that supports a number of for-profit companies involved in
education; and K12 Inc., a corporation that provides curriculum and related
services to “virtual” charter schools. Knowledge Universe is headed by Michael
Milken, the former junk-bond promoter who spent two years in prison on charges
of insider trading. K12 Inc. is headed by William Bennett, former secretary of
education under President George H. W. Bush. The Bracey analysis of KU warns
that although KU has the potential for significantly influencing the nation’s
public education system through its investment in publicly funded for-profit
education activities, its role has not been carefully examined by policy makers.
Bracey reports that KU is subject to far less scrutiny than public education
institutions. K12 provides “virtual” curriculum at taxpayer expense to students
enrolled in “virtual” charter schools. Ohanian, a former teacher, reviewed K12
Inc.’s history curriculum for grades K-2 and reports that the curriculum is
unimaginative and inappropriate for its target audience. Taken together, the
Bracey and Ohanian reports raise important questions about the policy
implications of companies that significantly influence public education policy
and practice, but that operate with relatively little public oversight.
Spotlight on Small Schools:
A new education website, funded by The Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation, is now online. The spotlight for the site’s debut is
on small schools. Future topics include Race and Education, Standardized
Testing, and Literature for Young Readers. Features include excerpts from books,
and, currently, an interview with Thomas Toch author of “High Schools on a Human
Scale: How Small Schools Can Transform American Education.” The site also
contains links to model small schools and other resources. http://www.beacon.org/education/
From Daley Set to Remake Troubled Schools, By Tracy Dell’Angela and Gary Washburn: A decade of highly touted reforms have failed to fix the city’s worst schools, Mayor Richard Daley [of Chicago] said Thursday, and the only solution left is to shut them down and start from scratch. With that blunt acknowledgment, Daley officially launched the most ambitious effort in a decade to remake the nation’s third-largest school system, a campaign that will lean heavily on the private sector for ideas, funding and day-to-day management of more than 100 reorganized schools. The switch to smaller, independently operated schools will focus on chronically poor performing high schools. By 2010 the mayor intends to re-create more than 10 percent of the city’s schools – one-third as charter schools, one third as independently operated contract schools and the remainder as small schools run by the district. This latest reform wave will put the responsibility for the city’s most difficult cases on the shoulders of businesses, non-profit organizations and freelance educators, giving them taxpayer support and wide latitude to operate the kinds of schools they think can deliver better results. The plan presents a serious threat to the teachers union, which is not guaranteed a role in staffing the charter and contract schools. The plan also could signal an end to the influence of already diminished local school councils and could exacerbate the district’s projected $100 million deficit. Given the outcry surrounding the closing of a handful of poorly performing schools in recent years, such a massive overhaul may also trigger widespread community protests. The mayor acknowledged that closing schools and then reopening them with new staffs and programs would cause considerable disruption. But he said that is better than prolonged failure. Chicago Tribune.
Starting a School Foundation, a helpful new primer, subtitled, “What you should know before you start fundraising,” was developed by the National School Boards Association to assist school board members in thinking broadly about education foundations at a time when these effective school reform organizations are becoming increasingly popular due to decreased tax revenues, budget cuts, and rising expectations. As Kate Coventry reports, K-12 education foundation activities run the gamut from funding scholarship and innovative programs to improve teaching and learning, to reinvigorating community participation in public education and spurring parent and citizen activism. The downloadable publication also includes key steps to consider in starting a school foundation, local education fund case studies, and an article by PEN’s president Wendy D. Puriefoy on the growing partnership between local education funds and school board leaders. http://www.nsba.org/site/docs/32800/32703.pdf
Audubon Expedition Institute
is an academically rigorous alternative to traditional colleges and universities
for undergraduate or graduate students pursuing a deeper ecological
understanding of environmental education, leadership and advocacy. Our goal is
to create experiential learning communities that inspire informed and
compassionate ecological leadership. This past summer Audubon Expedition
Institute found itself in the largest financial crisis of its 30-year history.
Lesley University, which has accredited AEI for nearly 25 years, offered AEI a
merger deal that required the school to raise $300,000 in about 75 days. The
successful grassroots effort involved contradances, an auction, personal letters
to alumni and friends, garage sales and appeals to major donors and foundations.
AEI is now working with Lesley University to become a division in one of their
five schools. For the foreseeable future, AEI will keep its office in Belfast
although some of the administrative will now be done in Cambridge, Massachusetts
where Lesley is located. Audubon Expedition Institute at Lesley University is
excited about the potential for greater impact and stability.
www.getonthebus.org
Citizens’ Endowment for
Education and Democracy (CEED) is the working name
for a budding campaign to transform K-12 education in America. Participants are
an emerging coalition of progressive and holistic education organizations and
people in “green” and “socially responsible” business networks. After an initial
gathering in February 2004, members of the group are developing an
Internet-based campaign to educate voters on education policy issues in the
months leading up to the election. A second outcome is working with Harmony
Education Center to develop long term strategies to form a coalition for
“schools that kids want to go to”. Joan Jaeckel, Director. Tel: (818) 430-2580.
www.whole.org (temporary web site).
CORE
is the national non-profit organization of residential education programs for
economically and socially disadvantaged youth. Founded in 1994, CORE’s mission
is to promote residential education for youth whose homes or communities cannot
meet their needs, and to strengthen both individual programs and the field of
residential education. To accomplish its mission, CORE is enhancing and sharing
professional practices and standards by running an association of residential
education programs; leading a national advocacy movement to develop policies
supportive of residential education; increasing public awareness of this
educational alternative; stimulating and assisting the development of new
residential education programs. CORE: The Coalition for Residential Education,
888 16th Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: (202) 496-9189
Fax: (202) 496-0006. Web:
www.residentialeducation.org.
From Beating the Bubble Test:
The Cost of Becoming an NCLB Success: Literacy first, canoe trips later, is
the new bargain at Garfield/Franklin elementary in Muscatine, Iowa. But with
increases on standardized tests come other more substantive losses, reports
Amanda Ripley. Creative writing, social studies and computer work have all
become occasional indulgences. Now that the standardized fill-in-the-bubble test
is the foundation upon which public schools rest — now that No Child Left Behind
mandates that kids as young as 9 meet benchmarks in reading and math or
jeopardize their schools’ reputation — there is little time for anything else.
Franklin is one of the new law’s success stories. After landing on the dreaded
Schools in Need of Improvement list two years ago, the students and staff clawed
their way off it. Through rote drills, one-on-one test talks and rigorous
analysis of students’ weaknesses, Franklin has become a reluctant model for the
rest of the nation. It has also become a very different place. The kids are
better readers, mathematicians and test takers. But while Democratic
presidential candidates have been lambasting the law’s funding levels,
Franklin’s teachers talk of other things. They bemoan a loss of spontaneity,
breadth and play — problems money won’t fix. The trade-off may be worth it, but
it is important to acknowledge the costs. http://www.time.com/
The Eight Year Study,
considered by many educational researchers to be one of the best program
evaluation studies ever conducted, followed the students from more than 30
experimental high schools during the 1930’s. It was originally published in
1942, and is now available online at http://www.8yearstudy.org/index.html.
ERIC Clearinghouse on
Educational Management has ended 37 years of
continuous operation at the University of Oregon. We’d like to express our
appreciation for your cooperation and support. We also want to inform you about
steps we are taking to keep the Clearinghouse’s extensive information resources
accessible to our clientele. We’ve decided to keep this Clearinghouse in
operation indefinitely, after shedding its ERIC affiliation, so that our
clientele can continue to have access to our resources. We will take on a new
identity as the Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management (CEPM),
operated by the College of Education, University of Oregon. Users may go to the
website address below for access to all the resources formerly produced by the
ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Our shipping and mailing addresses
will remain the same: Regular postal delivery: Clearinghouse on Educational
Policy and Management, 5207 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-5207.
Physical delivery: Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management, 975 High
Street, Suite 100, Eugene, Oregon 97401. Phone (541) 346-5044. Email: sales@cepm.uoregon.edu.
Website: http://cepm.uoregon.edu.
Senate approves landmark
school voucher plan: The Senate approved the
country’s first federally funded educational voucher scheme, which will enable
some poor public school students in Washington, D.C. to attend private schools.
The controversial voucher plan, so-called because it gives the families of
around 2,000 eligible Washington students vouchers worth up to $7,500 each for
private school tuition, was part of a delayed 2004 budget bill that passed
65-28. The five-year pilot project approved for the capital will be the
country’s first such federally funded plan for primary education. A handful of
locally funded voucher programs across the country have stirred deep
controversy. The federal government plans to monitor the results of the
Washington voucher pilot to see if it should be expanded to other cities with
troubled school systems. Reuters, CNN.com.
Montessori Attitude Tests Well,
by Suzanne Pardington: Eagle Peak Montessori School downplays the battery of
standardized tests all California students must take every spring in public
schools. No pressure. No drill-and-kill test prep. Children are simply told to
relax and do their best. The 2-year-old charter school is a somewhat reluctant
participant in the state’s school accountability program, because high-stakes
tests contradict the individualized approach of Montessori education. Yet the
school outpaced all the more conventional public schools in the Mt. Diablo
school district on the state’s Academic Performance Index for the 2002-03 school
year. Now in their third year, Eagle Peak’s founders and teachers attribute the
school’s academic gains to its growing stability, high academic expectations and
students’ increasing familiarity with Montessori’s hands-on style. They are
pleased at making progress on the official scale, but they say the scores don’t
tell them as much as daily evaluations of student work in the classroom. For
Eagle Peak and other charter schools that are breaking from mainstream public
education methods, the state testing program poses a unique challenge: how to
maintain the integrity of their vision while complying with state law. The issue
creates a constant tension for charter schools that believe assessments should
be more individualized, said David Patterson, a former director of government
relations for a statewide charter school organization who now heads Rocklin
Academy charter school in the Sacramento area. Formal tests are rare in
Montessori schools. The school adopted a new Montessori math curriculum last
year and started to align the school’s entire curriculum to the state standards
to ensure that students were learning what the state expected them to know on
the tests. Most of the same skills are covered in Montessori classrooms, but
they sometimes come in a different order.
Using Students as Substitute
Teachers: Sound scary? Eighth grade math teacher
Bob Brems has prepped student volunteers to teach his classes for several years.
Unhappy with inconsistent results and lousy reports from substitutes, Brems came
up with a new strategy for his planned days off. He turns over the teaching
reins to one of his students. In this Education World article, Brems describes
his system and its benefits. Of course, there IS an adult sub in the room, but
his student-volunteers do the teaching. http://www.educationworld.com.
Free-choice learning
is the type of learning guided by a person’s needs and interests. As the world
transitions from an industrial society to an information society, learning
across the lifespan becomes increasingly important. Adults and children are
spending more and more of their time learning, but not just in classrooms or on
the job, but through free-choice learning at home, after work and on weekends.
The Institute for Learning Innovation is committed to better understanding,
facilitating and advocating for this historically under-studied and
under-appreciated mode of learning. Access to quality free-choice learning
should not be a privilege of the affluent but a right of all citizens.
Currently, there is a free-choice learning divide. There is evidence that when
provided the opportunity, economically and socially disadvantaged populations
equally utilized and benefited from free-choice learning situations. Only
through greater public recognition and support can we hope to insure that
free-choice learning will truly be accessible to all citizens. Any public
education reform effort that does not embrace the benefits of free-choice
learning is incomplete. Contact us at info@ilinet.org, heimlich.1@osu.edu, or
heimlich@ilinet.org.
From Educators Flocking to
Finland, Land of Literate Children,
by Lizette Alvarez,
NY Times: In Finland children do not start school until they are 7, spending is
$5,000 a year per student, there are no gifted programs and class sizes often
approach 30. Finland topped a respected international survey last year, coming
in first in literacy and placing in the top five in math and science. The
rankings were based on reading, math and science tests given to a sample of
15-year-olds attending both public and private schools. United States students
placed in the middle of the pack. Finland’s recipe is both complex and
unabashedly basic. If one trait sets Finland apart from many other countries, it
is the quality and social standing of its teachers. All teachers in Finland must
have at least a master’s degree, and while they are no better paid than teachers
in other countries, the profession is highly respected. So long as schools stick
to the core national curriculum, which lays out goals and subject areas, they
are free to teach the way they want. They can choose their textbooks or ditch
them altogether, teach indoors or outdoors, cluster children in small or large
groups. Students must learn two foreign languages: Swedish, and most also take
English. Art, music, physical education, woodwork and textiles (which is mostly
sewing and knitting) are obligatory for girls and boys.
From Students Are in No Place
to Judge Quality Education: Students would resume giving feedback on their
teachers if officials reinstate a program that has attracted strong opposition
from SchoolMatch consultants evaluating the school district. The practice of
having parents and students give written evaluations on classroom teachers was
stopped last June amid concerns that the process was unfair and the results were
used inconsistently from school to school. Six months later, an Ohio-based
education auditing firm that has been studying the city’s schools for the
Chamber of Commerce and many local businesses recommended ending the process
permanently, noting that in some cases, the results were allowed to creep into
official teacher evaluations. “We’ve audited over 1,000 school districts
nationwide and we’ve never seen anonymous surveys used in the teacher evaluation
process,” said Dr. William L. Bainbridge, president and CEO of SchoolMatch. “We
thought it was repugnant.” Nevertheless, a majority of the school board is ready
to approve a new response form, with the only snag being who would collect the
forms and compile the data. “I completely disagree with them,” board member
Vincent Capasso said of SchoolMatch’s position. “That’s the party line. That’s
not very forward thinking.” Capasso is among a group of board members who think
teachers, like many professionals, should be reviewed by their customers. Just
as a sales manager for a car dealer should know if a customer had a good or bad
experience with a sales clerk, Capasso said school administrators should know
what parents and students think about a teacher’s performance. But SchoolMatch
officials argue that students are the products of a school system, not the
consumers. The company doesn’t seek student opinion during their audit process,
and they don’t hide that fact. “We frankly don’t care about their opinions,”
Bainbridge said when questioned about the absence of student voices in the
company’s analysis. “I’m not particularly interested in what minor children have
to say.” Bainbridge believes that when given a chance to evaluate their
teachers, some students inevitably will call a challenging teacher one of their
worst, but years later will change their minds.
First Amendment Schools:
Educating for Freedom and Responsibility,
co-sponsored by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD)
and the First Amendment Center, is a national initiative designed to transform
how schools model and teach the rights and responsibilities of citizenship that
frame civic life in our democracy. The project has four primary goals: (1)
Create consensus guidelines and guiding principles for all schools interested in
creating and sustaining First Amendment principles in their school; (2)
Establish project schools, in every region of the nation, where First Amendment
principles are understood and applied throughout the school community; (3)
Encourage and develop curriculum reforms that reinvigorate and deepen teaching
about the First Amendment across the curriculum; and (4) Educate school leaders,
teachers, school board members and attorneys, and other key stakeholders about
the meaning and significance of First Amendment principles and ideals. To
achieve these goals, the First Amendment Schools project serves as a national
resource for all schools – K-12, public and private – interested in affirming
First Amendment principles and putting them into action in their school
communities. http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/
Brain Waves Used to Work
Computers: New computer technology has been
invented to allow hands-free steering of sail boats to help students with
profound multiple disabilities use computers. Students who cannot walk or talk
and have limited use of their arms and legs, wear a headband equipped with three
sensors and use brain waves, eye movement, facial muscles and teeth to operate
computers. The technology is called Cyberlink Brainfingers is at Cal State
Northridge. For more information, visit www.brainfingers. com.
Theatre for Living
uses the language of theatre as a means of creating change.
It gives a community the opportunity to investigate alternative approaches to
controversial issues. Based on “Theatre of the Oppressed” theories and tools
originated by Brazilian Director Augusto Boal, TFL is a way of communicating
that invites the “living community” to tell its own stories. TFL techniques have
been applied to mainstream theatre, interdisciplinary work, personal, community
and team development, anti-racism and violence prevention, environmental action,
education and counseling. Using a symbolic language, participants develop
“emotional intelligence”, move towards open communication and begin to create
their desired realities in an active and entertaining way. This training will be
invaluable for anyone who seeks skills and techniques to use theatrical language
to explore community dialogue. Headlines Theatre is a multi-award winning world
leader in developing community-specific, issue-oriented theatre. We have 22
years of experience working in over 320 communities throughout Canada and around
the world. Please contact Jennifer Girard, Outreach Coordinator, at 604-871-0508
or outreach@headlinestheatre.com. 323-350 E Second Ave., Vancouver, BC Canada
V5T 4R8.
From Study Says U.S. Should
Replace States’ High School Standards by Karen W. Arenson: A patchwork of
state standards is failing to produce high school graduates who are prepared
either for college or for work, three education policy organizations say in a
new report. The solution, they say, is to adopt rigorous national standards that
will turn the high school diploma into a “common national currency.” Working
through what they call the American Diploma Project, the organizations — Achieve
Inc., the Education Trust and the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation — consulted with
higher education officials and business executives in five states to develop
standards they say will ensure that high school graduates are equipped to move
into either college-level work or a decent-paying job. “For many kids, the
diploma is a ticket to nowhere,” Kati Haycock, director of the Education Trust,
said. “In this era, where some postsecondary education is essential, that’s no
good.” The report charges that employers and postsecondary institutions “all but
ignore the diploma, knowing that it often serves as little more than a
certificate of attendance,” because “what it takes to earn one is disconnected
from what it takes for graduates to compete successfully beyond high school.”
The diploma project recommends that the N.A.E.P. tests be realigned based on
standards in the report. Some critics of high-stakes testing say the challenge
is not determining what students ought to know, but in teaching them. “They’re
saying that if we have one set of standards, students will meet them,” said
Monty Neill, executive director of the National Center for Fair and Open Testing
in Cambridge, Mass. “But if you are not going to provide the resources to help
students meet the standards, they’re not going to meet them, whatever the
standards are.” NY Times
Private Kennebunk School to Celebrate its Return Home, by Beth Quimby, Portland Press: The New School, a private high school in Kennebunk, was founded in 2000 as an offshoot of The School Around Us, a private school in Arundel for students in kindergarten through grade 8. There are no grades. Instead, students must provide evidence that they have met learning standards. The courses are largely interdisciplinary and often include work outside of class. The New School has 30 students, three full-time teachers and more than 60 people from surrounding communities who provide instruction. After months of wandering, The New School is back in its building. The small, private high school had to abandon the building last fall when a renovation project at the 38 York St. facility went haywire. Principal Marylyn Wentworth said the school received a $450,000 loan from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to buy and renovate the building, which was built as an automotive parts store in 1968. The idea was to continue to meet in the school throughout the project. The roof had been removed and replaced with a tarpaulin during Thanksgiving vacation when a powerful rainstorm reduced the tarpaulin to tatters. The students and teachers suddenly needed alternative quarters. St. David’s Episcopal Church in Kennebunk opened its doors to the school for a month. St. Martha’s Catholic Church took in the school for a week. River Tree Arts offered space at the Kennebunk train depot, where the school continued to operate until May 1, when it finally moved back to 38 York St. The renovation has transformed the moldy former auto parts store into an airy, brightly lit space. The project was helped along by a lot of volunteers. Students also got involved in the project.
Yaacov Hecht
came to New York and held a weekend-long lecture and workshop series at Calhoun
School in Manhattan. Many people came – from New York City, Albany,
Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Canada, and even one person from Switzerland, Marco
Bichsel. The responses from those who came were extremely positive, and
connections were made for additional workshops in the future. Yaacov toured
around Calhoun on Friday, along with those of us who will be traveling to Israel
to spend 5 weeks working with Yaacov and the Institute for Democratic Education.
The Calhoun School is a private college preparatory and distinctly progressive
school. It has a small size, teachers go by first name, and there is a strong
relationship among students and staff. The lower school director, Kathleen
Clinesmith, had been instrumental in organizing this event along with the five
of us going to Israel. She set up meetings for Yaacov with the head of Calhoun
School, who discussed the possibility of Yaacov returning and conducting more
intense workshops with the school community. Eighty-five people showed up at the
Friday night lecture, including over 25 teachers/parents from Calhoun, several
teachers from the Renaissance Charter School in Queens, two groups of democratic
school starters in the New York City area, and many other teachers and students.
Larry Hutchinson from Pennsylvania brought five grandchildren, who said they had
life-changing experiences. A core group of thirty-five people attended the full
events, including the two-day-long workshop. The thirty-five were grouped into
5-person groups for much discussion and interaction about pluralistic learning,
school creation, and personal goals. Each group produced pictures and statements
that were hung up in the “gallery” and viewed by all. Dana Bennis.
From The Real-Life ‘School
of Rock’: David Wish started the Little Kids Rock
program to bring together professional musicians and school children. As fans
flock to “School of Rock,” the hit movie about a rock ‘n’ roller masquerading as
a teacher, Wish and friends are doing it in real life. The year-old program
called Little Kids Rock reaches about 2,000 children in 130 public schools in
New York, San Francisco, Memphis, Tennessee, and Newark, New Jersey. The goal is
to fill a void where music education has been cut, while building a curriculum
based on improvisation and participation. Children are treated to classroom
visits from stars like Bonnie Raitt and Tom Waits, who recently showed up at the
Spring Valley Elementary School in San Francisco. Harmonica virtuoso Norton
Buffalo, former Metallica bass guitarist Jason Newsted and singer-songwriter
Austin Willacy have also turned up in classrooms. In the mid-1990s, when he was
a regular first-grade teacher in Redwood City, California, Wish noticed that
music as a subject was falling between the cracks. That’s when he first tried
out his spontaneous style of teaching in after-school lessons for a few kids.
Wish started Little Kids Rock with $60,000 in foundation and individual
contributions. Most of the 200 teachers volunteer their time, although some get
a small stipend from their schools. Some classes are part of the school day,
although many sessions are scheduled after regular school hours. Wish has
enlisted a number of stars by sending them samples of the children’s music. CDs
of Little Kids Rock were mailed to the likes of B.B. King and Carlos Santana.
Some have lent their names to the project; others have volunteered classroom
time. Wish hopes still others will record some of the kids’ songs for a
fund-raising CD to be released next year.
From
Concord School Lets students Rule, At Diablo Valley, Kids
Guide the Curriculum, by Jason B. Johnson:
There is no bell to start the day’s classes at the Diablo Valley School in
Concord. In fact, there isn’t even a principal or teachers in the white stucco
building. Instead, the school’s 18 students do what they want when they want. As
a group, they make and enforce school rules and mete out justice in a youth-run
court. Diablo Valley is a Sudbury school, one of about a dozen in the nation
modeled after the Sudbury Valley School, which opened in 1968 in a Boston
suburb. Concord residents Ofer and Amy Erez started the school in 1997 as an
educational alternative for their son Yo’el, now 10 years old. The private
school is not accredited by the state. The students range from 6 to 16 years
old. There are similar schools in Santa Clara, Marin and Sacramento, Amy Erez
said. Sudbury schools – there are about 20 worldwide – are private schools where
students are free to study whatever subjects interest them at their own speed.
There is no imposed class time or structure and no age-based classes. Since the
state department of public education only deals with public schools, it does not
collect data on the Sudbury school format or its results. Lori Shepard, dean of
the School of Education at the University of Colorado at Boulder, said the
Sudbury system could benefit students who don’t do well in traditional schools.
Usually the younger a child is enrolled at Diablo Valley, the longer he or she
stays, according to school officials, noting that older kids often tend to
transfer after a year or two because of the stark contrast with traditional
schools. Because it is a private school, no standardized testing is required.
The schools run counter to many accepted ideas about education because they
eschew structure and heavy reliance on standardized testing. Instead of
teachers, there are three “staff” members who help guide the children in
planning and carrying out daily activities and long-term projects. Two are
mothers of students in the school, while the third staff member, Anthony Burik,
previously taught at a San Francisco middle school. Students are required to be
at school at least four hours a day. They are free to attend activities and
classes elsewhere, but must sign themselves in and out. E-mail Jason B. Johnson
at jbjohnson@sfchronicle. com.
The information resource you have
published on the Internet: Alternative Education Resource Organization
(http://www.educationrevolution.org/) has been cited in The Infography as one of
the six superlative sources of information about the subject of “Education –
Alternative – United States.” This is truly an honor for your online resource
because it has been selected for citation by an expert who is a specialist about
this subject. Based upon this independent scholar’s recommendation, we at Fields
of Knowledge are proud to refer students and librarians to the information you
have made available to the learning public. Congratulations, Howard Chesshire,
Fields of Knowledge, 27 West View, Springfield, VT 05156. Email: hchesshire@fieldsofknowledge.com.
Web: http://www.fieldsofknowledge.com.
Ananda Institute of
Alternative Living is looking for students
interested in attending our summer camps (located at the institute) and also
high school students and college students interested in attending an alternative
university. We are located in the Sierra Nevada foothills near Nevada City, CA.
Our students learn in the experiential method—for instance they learn
traditional physics and math and then learn to apply this through actually
creating fuel cells and other alternative energy projects. We also teach
meditation & yoga and “Education for Life” methods to help students with
self-discovery and finding happiness in their lives. Email Sara Cryer at
registrar@anandauniversity.org. Tel: (530) 478-7612.
Public Alternatives
From Charter Distinction Saves
Small Schools by Julia Silverman, AP: Just about all 80 students in Paisley
Oregon gathered to cheer their superintendent as he headed to the state capital
to try and save their school from extinction after $286,000 in budget cuts. Mark
Jeffery went to Salem that day looking for a last-ditch miracle – and now, two
years later, with his school richer by $350,000 in federal funding, he believes
he’s found one. Paisley saved its school by turning it into a charter school,
bringing in federal money earmarked to get these new institutions off the
ground. It’s an increasingly common option among the small, rural schools in the
West as they struggle to survive budget cuts, declining enrollment and forced
consolidation with other schools. In Paisley and communities like it, charter
startup money buys the chance to breathe life into an existing school. Paisley,
a town of about 250 people in south-central Oregon where the big event in summer
is the Mosquito Festival, has been fighting for its school ever since a local
lumber mill closed in the early 1990s. Residents even built a dormitory for
foreign students to boost enrollment, and for a while there were Albanians and
Koreans in town. But by 2002, Jeffery had to close the school’s cafeteria and
library, cut out languages and the business program, and fire the janitor. Even
that wasn’t enough, and families began considering the possibility they would
have to bus their kids to another school, 50 miles away on a bumpy two-lane road
that ices over from November to March. One concern that was voiced was that a
charter school would collapse when the federal startup money runs out and it had
to return to reliance on shaky state funding. Paisley’s federal grant stops
flowing in May 2005. Jeffery thinks enough has changed since the charter began
to allow the Paisley school to survive past the end of the federal funding. “We
believe what we have built here is a system that can continue to operate,” he
said. “As long as we don’t lose too many more students. Our hope is to last long
enough to see changes in funding and tax structures that could enable rural
education to survive.” http://www.ruraledu.org/
Our school opened in Sept ‘03. We
are a charter school, free, public, for grades 6-9 (eventually through 12)
called Imagine Academy.
We began with 65 students, grew to 89 during the year and have 140 enrolled for
next year. We see ourselves as moving toward a collaborative governance system.
We have students, parents and staff on our board. We are scaffolding parents and
students into more active participants. Our educational program is project
based, experiential, and constructivist. We took on a great deal and are very
glad to be nearing the end of our first year with many personal and professional
successes for students, parents, faculty and administration. Tel: (818)
368-1557. Fax: (818) 368-1935. Email Sue Bryan at: imagineacademy@hotmail.com
Pacifica Community Charter
School and The Center for Nonviolent Communication
are pleased to announce that they received $50,000 in funding from the Tides
Foundation for a 2-year project that will contribute to Pacifica’s mission by
providing Nonviolent Communication training and workshops for the entire
Pacifica Community. The Pacifica teaching staff is receiving extensive training.
The Parenting for Peace Workshop Series is this year’s offering for parents,
board members & families. Parenting for Peace Workshops are designed to
contribute to meeting parents’ needs for support, connection, understanding,
acceptance, growth, hope, inspiration, and more, thereby supporting parents’
ability to nurture a generation of people who grow up with a peaceful paradigm.
Each workshop provides a combination of short presentation with fun exercises
for practicing communication skills that help create more connection,
cooperation, harmony and fun in relationships with children (and people of all
ages). Our request and hope is that you can come to all of the workshops as each
one will focus on a different theme, and your skills will grow with repeated
exposure and practice. Web: www.cnvc.org.
Home Education
African-American Unschooling
is the Internet resource for African-American Homeschoolers with an Africentric
approach to learning all the time. African-American Unschoolers encounter math,
science, reading, writing, art and history in the Real World because real living
leads to real learning! Visit African-American Unschooling for creative ideas on
incorporating African and African-American culture into your homeschooling,
articles and resources on unschooling, and networking with other
African-American Unschoolers and Homeschoolers. Website: http://www.afamunschool.com.
African-American Unschooling Press. Contact: S. Courtney Walton, Editor. Email:
editor@afamunschool.com. Voice: (623) 205-9883.
Yahoo Group for Home-Educated
Students at University: I recently gave an
interview to the Times Higher Ed supplement and realised that we had virtually
no info regarding the experiences of home-educated students at university. It
then occurred to me that a Yahoo group created for this purpose might be very
useful for both our selves, our children as they reach the age when university
is becoming an issue for them and as a forum for home-educated students actually
at university. So I’ve created a yahoo group for this purpose: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HE-Uni/.
This group could help close the information gap we have regarding home-educated
children at university. Mike F-W
From Unschooling: No rules for
free-form education: Close to 3,000 children are being home-schooled in New
Jersey, according to the latest figures available from the state Education
Department. Traditionally, home-schooling parents follow a set curriculum, plan
lessons and set aside time to formally instruct their children. But there are
others who reject even that much structure. They are part of a movement known as
“unschooling,” a loose-yet-legal amalgam of learning, exploring and “everyday
life” activities that replace the classroom for an undetermined number of
home-schooled youngsters. The National Center for Education Statistics estimates
about 850,000 American children are home-schooled, and some advocates believe
roughly 5 percent to 10 percent of them are unschooled. New Jersey law requires
only that parents who teach their children at home make sure they receive
academic instruction equivalent to that in public schools. If concerns arise
that parents might be failing to educate a child, the burden is on the state to
prove it in court. Some unschoolers don’t start reading until they’re 12, and
some educators warn that unschooled children risk growing up without basic
reading, math and social skills. But unschooling’s supporters claim the process
works because children, so naturally curious, have more motivation to learn if
they are free to follow their own interests rather than languish in regimented
conventional classrooms. Copyright 2003, The Associated Press
Since 1994 the Family Resource
Center (FRC) been working with over 2,500 organizations, museums, zoos,
aquariums, historic sites, science centers and theatres of New England
organizing educational programming and group visits for homeschooling families.
Homeschooling families interested in exploring regions of beautiful New England
would enjoy FRC’s Extended Stay Program multi-day mini trips. The best Museum
and Community Education programs are arranged by the Family Resource Center and
you are welcome to join us for any or all of the trips. Families are responsible
for arranging their own lodging, meals and transportation to and from each site.
http://www.homestead.com/prosites-bigbear001/FAQ_ New~ns4.html.
Driver Education for
Homeschoolers: I currently have a bill in the
Vermont legislature that is an alternative to traditional driver education
offered in the public schools. The current language allows for state approval of
driver education course for homeschool use by parents and their teens.
Homeschoolers would know that the course would contain the necessary components
that a Vermont driver would need to know. Homeschoolers find it hard to get into
driver education in the schools. We are then left with expensive commercial
schools or the children wait until they are 18 and take the road test anyway.
The bill passed out of House Education and is now in House Transportation. I
have found that the so-called driving “experts” can’t agree how driver education
should be delivered. Graduated driver licensing works to save lives and parents
are the enforcers of it. Graduated driver licensing works, with or without
traditional driver education. I do not want what the schools use moved into my
car. I want an alternative that is written for parents to guide them as they
apprentice their teen in a car through graduated driver licensing system. Retta
Dunlap
From Does Homeschooling Impact
Your Neighborhood Schools? Your Wallet: The creative adaptation of school
choice policy has beset state officials with troubling questions. Cyber and
homeschool charter schools have become a prominent part of the charter school
movement and begun to challenge conventional learning by delivering curriculum